From: The influence of surficial features in lava flow modelling
| Parameter | Scenario | Value | Source/Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Easting (M) | Mt Eden | 1,757,370 | Hayes et al. (2018) |
| Ōtāhuhu | 1,765,010 | ||
| Birkenhead Lava Flow 1 | 1,755,916 | ||
| Birkenhead Lava Flow 2 | 1,755,914 | ||
| Northing (M) | Mt Eden | 5,916,250 | |
| Ōtāhuhu | 5,909,090 | ||
| Birkenhead Lava Flow 1 | 5,923,738 | ||
| Birkenhead Lava Flow 2 | 5,923,767 | ||
| Volume (M3) | Mt Eden | 59,871,290 | |
| Ōtāhuhu | 450,970 | ||
| Birkenhead Lava Flow 1 | 960,810 | ||
| Birkenhead Lava Flow 2 | 8,647,290 | ||
| Modal thickness (M) | all | 17.5 | Hayes et al. (2018) |
| Pulse Volume (M3) | Mt Eden | 1000 | Based on authors’ available computational memory |
| Ōtāhuhu | 10 | ||
| Birkenhead Lava Flow 1 | 10 | ||
| Birkenhead Lava Flow 2 | 100 |