Table 3 Comparison of the DEM and DSM modelling results, including median and thicknesses in metres, the Jaccard coefficient, and the runout length. Thicknesses have been rounded to the nearest quarter metre
From: The influence of surficial features in lava flow modelling
Scenario | Median thickness (m) | Mean thickness (m) | Jaccard Coefficient (%) | Runout length (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM | DSM | DEM | DSM | |||
Mt Eden | 17.75 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 16.75 | 63 | 89 |
Ōtāhuhu | 17.5 | 17.5 | 16.75 | 16.75 | 90 | 98 |
Birkenhead Lava Flow 1 | 17.0 | 17.5 | 16.5 | 16.75 | 40 | 76 |
Birkenhead Lava Flow 2 | 17.75 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 65 | 79 |