Skip to main content

Table 10 Regression results for intentions to prepare, personal preparedness, and having prepared an evacuation kit

From: Community preparedness for volcanic hazards at Mount Rainier, USA

 

Intentions to prepare

Variables

B

SE

β

p

Risk perception (likelihood)

.261

.068

.196

.000

Risk perception (threat)

.016

.058

.016

.781

Self-efficacy

−.064

.047

−.077

.174

Unrealistic optimism

.011

.070

.009

.869

Model result

F(4, 384) = 4.35, p < .01, R2 = .04

 

Personal preparedness

 

B

SE

β

p

Risk perception (likelihood)

.077

.060

.054

.196

Risk perception (threat)

.003

.050

.003

.953

Self-efficacy

.588

.041

.602

.000

Unrealistic optimism

−.080

.061

−.060

.191

Model results

F(4, 384) = 53.41, p < .01, R2 = .36

 

Prepared a kit

 

B

SE

Exp(B)

p

Risk perception (likelihood)

.291

.129

1.338

.024

Risk perception (threat)

−.011

.108

0.989

.922

Self-efficacy

.540

.095

1.756

.000

Unrealistic optimism

.070

.129

1.073

.584

Model Result

χ2(4) = 43.45, p < .001, R2 = .14a

  1. aThis is a the Nagelkerke “pseudo R2” statistic. Values range from 0 to 1 similar to an ordinary least squares R2, but cannot be interpreted in exactly the same way.