Skip to main content

Table 7 Differences in variables of interest depending on type of evacuation route tested

From: Community preparedness for volcanic hazards at Mount Rainier, USA

  Intentions
Evacuation route tested M SD Means comparison
Official 2.49 1.14 F(3, 579) = 2.40, p = .067, ηp2 = .01
Unofficial 2.68 1.06  
Both 2.58 1.19  
Neither 2.72 1.15  
  Preparedness
  M SD Means comparison
Official 2.96 1.17 F(3, 581) = 24.46, p < .001, ηp2 = .11
Unofficial 3.08 1.07  
Both 3.15 1.13  
Neither 2.27 1.11  
  Self-efficacy
  M SD Means comparison
Official 3.51 1.20 F(3, 452) = 15.85, p < .001, ηp2 = .10
Unofficial 4.08 .92  
Both 3.68 1.17  
Neither 2.94 1.36  
  Threat  
  M SD Means comparison
Official 3.70 1.14 F(3, 507) = 7.99, p < .001, ηp2 = .05
Unofficial 3.53 1.13  
Both 4.02 0.99  
Neither 3.38 1.21  
  Likelihood  
  M SD Means comparison
Official 2.71 0.84 F(3, 519) = 2.90, p < .05, ηp2 = .02
Unofficial 2.88 0.77  
Both 3.06 0.80  
Neither 2.90 0.93  
  Evacuation kit  
  Yes No Ratio comparison
Official 44 69 X2(3) = 31.86, p < .001, V = .24
Unofficial 33 28  
Both 67 37  
Neither 88 171