Table 7 Differences in variables of interest depending on type of evacuation route tested
From: Community preparedness for volcanic hazards at Mount Rainier, USA
| Intentions | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Evacuation route tested | M | SD | Means comparison |
| Official | 2.49 | 1.14 | F(3, 579) = 2.40, p = .067, ηp2 = .01 |
| Unofficial | 2.68 | 1.06 | |
| Both | 2.58 | 1.19 | |
| Neither | 2.72 | 1.15 | |
| Preparedness | |||
| M | SD | Means comparison | |
| Official | 2.96 | 1.17 | F(3, 581) = 24.46, p < .001, ηp2 = .11 |
| Unofficial | 3.08 | 1.07 | |
| Both | 3.15 | 1.13 | |
| Neither | 2.27 | 1.11 | |
| Self-efficacy | |||
| M | SD | Means comparison | |
| Official | 3.51 | 1.20 | F(3, 452) = 15.85, p < .001, ηp2 = .10 |
| Unofficial | 4.08 | .92 | |
| Both | 3.68 | 1.17 | |
| Neither | 2.94 | 1.36 | |
| Threat | |||
| M | SD | Means comparison | |
| Official | 3.70 | 1.14 | F(3, 507) = 7.99, p < .001, ηp2 = .05 |
| Unofficial | 3.53 | 1.13 | |
| Both | 4.02 | 0.99 | |
| Neither | 3.38 | 1.21 | |
| Likelihood | |||
| M | SD | Means comparison | |
| Official | 2.71 | 0.84 | F(3, 519) = 2.90, p < .05, ηp2 = .02 |
| Unofficial | 2.88 | 0.77 | |
| Both | 3.06 | 0.80 | |
| Neither | 2.90 | 0.93 | |
| Evacuation kit | |||
| Yes | No | Ratio comparison | |
| Official | 44 | 69 | X2(3) = 31.86, p < .001, V = .24 |
| Unofficial | 33 | 28 | |
| Both | 67 | 37 | |
| Neither | 88 | 171 | |