Skip to main content

Table 7 Differences in variables of interest depending on type of evacuation route tested

From: Community preparedness for volcanic hazards at Mount Rainier, USA

 

Intentions

Evacuation route tested

M

SD

Means comparison

Official

2.49

1.14

F(3, 579) = 2.40, p = .067, ηp2 = .01

Unofficial

2.68

1.06

 

Both

2.58

1.19

 

Neither

2.72

1.15

 
 

Preparedness

 

M

SD

Means comparison

Official

2.96

1.17

F(3, 581) = 24.46, p < .001, ηp2 = .11

Unofficial

3.08

1.07

 

Both

3.15

1.13

 

Neither

2.27

1.11

 
 

Self-efficacy

 

M

SD

Means comparison

Official

3.51

1.20

F(3, 452) = 15.85, p < .001, ηp2 = .10

Unofficial

4.08

.92

 

Both

3.68

1.17

 

Neither

2.94

1.36

 
 

Threat

 
 

M

SD

Means comparison

Official

3.70

1.14

F(3, 507) = 7.99, p < .001, ηp2 = .05

Unofficial

3.53

1.13

 

Both

4.02

0.99

 

Neither

3.38

1.21

 
 

Likelihood

 
 

M

SD

Means comparison

Official

2.71

0.84

F(3, 519) = 2.90, p < .05, ηp2 = .02

Unofficial

2.88

0.77

 

Both

3.06

0.80

 

Neither

2.90

0.93

 
 

Evacuation kit

 
 

Yes

No

Ratio comparison

Official

44

69

X2(3) = 31.86, p < .001, V = .24

Unofficial

33

28

 

Both

67

37

 

Neither

88

171

Â