From: A model to assess tephra clean-up requirements in urban environments
Assumption/simplification | Implication for model output | ||
---|---|---|---|
Under estimation | Over estimation | Negligible | |
Removal volumes | |||
 No other waste streams (e.g., construction/demolition) | x |  |  |
 No clean-up within 500 m of vent due to level of destruction | x |  |  |
 Remobilisation of deposits not considered | x |  |  |
 Potential for deposits to infiltrate storm water system not considered |  | x |  |
 100% of tephra on surfaces removed |  | x |  |
 Asset sub-categories not considered (e.g., building/road typologies) |  | x |  |
 Long lasting eruption/multiple fallout events | x | x |  |
Clean-up duration | |||
 Clean-up vehicles can operate on tephra covered roads | x |  |  |
 Traffic not considered | x |  |  |
 Time moving tephra from properties to pick-up points not considered |  |  | x |
 Potential restrictions on truck routes to disposal sites not considered | x |  |  |
 Worker breaks and vehicle maintenance not considered | x |  |  |
 Shortest trip duration to contingency plan disposal sites must be used | x |  |  |
 Duration for scoping and planning not considered |  |  | x |
 Disposal site operational capacity not considered | x |  |  |
 Street sweeper travel inefficiencies (e.g., moving around parked cars) | x |  |  |
 Assume rational operators within system | x |  |  |
 Heavy machinery quantity scaled for truck fleet requirements | x |  |  |
 Experience level of clean-up managers not considered | x |  |  |
 Remobilisation not considered | x |  |  |
 Rainfall not considered | x | x |  |
 Time it takes material to accumulate not considered | x |  |  |
Clean-up cost | |||
 Existing solid waste and disaster waste contracts | x | x | x |
 Coordination and volunteerism costs | x |  |  |
 Business disruption costs | x |  |  |
 No post-disaster price escalation | x |  |  |