- Open Access
Bridging Māori indigenous knowledge and western geosciences to reduce social vulnerability in active volcanic regions
© Pardo et al.; licensee Springer. 2015
- Received: 30 June 2014
- Accepted: 16 December 2014
- Published: 5 February 2015
A new pedagogical methodology is proposed to reduce the social vulnerability of indigenous communities occupying areas subject to volcanic activity, as a potential interactive approach between those communities, scientists, and scientific institutions. The multidisciplinary methodology aims to increase scientist’s understanding of the relationship between native inhabitants and active volcanoes in indigenous territories, and to improve the effective dissemination of information. Also, the proposed methodology offers to the local community the scientific knowledge in an understandable and useful way, in order to maximize people’s awareness of their exposure to volcanic activity. The procedure starts with the recognition of the local ancestral comprehension of the volcano and the cultural, ecological, and economical bonds between humans and volcanic processes. Subsequently, the transmission of the indigenous knowledge to the scientific community and the appropriation of geological knowledge by the children and teachers in a specific Māori primary school in New Zealand, allowed: (1) the establishment of a common language, (2) enhanced communication and collaboration between the participants involved in understanding and living with an active volcano, and (3) increased awareness about the relationship between humans and active volcanoes.
A permanent application (and site-specific adjustment) of this method, and the use of the resulting teaching tools, could reduce social vulnerability and empower indigenous communities in the development of volcanic risk mitigation strategies by revitalizing and sharing knowledge, rather than imposing one epistemological system onto the other.
- Body language
- Ngāti Rangi
- Volcanic risk
The lack of dialogue among stakeholders undertaking volcanic risk management hinders agreement in front of decision-making processes (cf., King et al. 2007). The scarcity of programs that integrate scientific-knowledge with the local epistemology, including the environmental and cultural relationship between the community exposed to volcanic eruptions and the volcano itself, is a key factor increasing the social vulnerability (cf., Alexander 1993, Paton et al. 2001, Paton et al. 2008, Vervaeck 2012). This is critical in the case of lands occupied by indigenous communities where the relationship between people and territory is long and more complex than a simple land occupation for resource management (cf., Marsden 1988, 1992).
In most of the indigenous communities worldwide, the territory is the centre of their identity, culture, livelihood practices, ecology, economy, and knowledge and belief systems (cf., Feiring 2013). Therefore, the concept of territory is usually closest to the scientific notion of “ecosystem” than to the western concept of “land”. However, it differs in that the perception of the territory by most indigenous people is also based on the idea that everything in the environment has life and spirit (cf., Berkers et al. 1998). Although spirituality has been traditionally excluded from any scientific approach, Anderson (1996) pointed out that “all traditional societies that have succeeded in managing resources well, over time, have done it in part through religious or ritual representation of resource management. The key is not religion per se, but the use of emotionally powerful cultural symbols to sell particular moral codes and management systems”.
The value of traditional knowledge in sustainable development and ecosystem management, biodiversity conservation, and climate change adaptation has been increasingly recognized by the western knowledge (scientific) systems (Feiring 2013). In Oceania cultures (including Polynesians), Berkers et al. (1998) identified one of the richest set of ecosystem applications, where the key characteristics defining the territory as an ecosystem-like unit are: (1) a unit with the height of land between adjacent valleys serving as the biophysical boundary; (2) the recognition of land and sea space as a continuum; (3) the presence of a social and ethical mechanism for integrating humans and nature, where elders and leaders encourage the responsibility for the land within a system of conservation-through-use. Within these concepts, western science increasingly acknowledges indigenous understanding of the non-linearity and openness of the natural ecosystems, which are not always predictable and, certainly, not always controllable (cf., Gunderson et al. 1995, Ludwig et al. 1993). Moreover, the criteria of territory delimitation in many traditional cultures worldwide are watershed-based, which has been interpreted by Berkers et al. (1998) as a mirror of their dependence on local resources.
Understanding the local indigenous vision about nature, as well as the cultural and environmental links with the territory is critical, not only for the development of conservation strategies (e.g., Stevenson 1996), but also for hazard mitigation and risk management (cf., King et al. 2007; Cronin and Cashman 2008). For example, King et al. (2008) postulated how Māori Environmental knowledge in New Zealand provides a collection of observations, records, monitoring and forecast methods of changes in their physical environment that contribute to hazard mitigation. Likewise, Lowe et al. (2002) demonstrated how Māori oral history of volcanic eruptions were a valuable source of information, not only on past eruption records, but also, on the understanding of past response and recovery of Māori tribes to volcanic hazards. Similarly, King et al. (2008) carried on an extensive approach on how Māori oral narratives, laments, quotations, proverbs, songs, and place names relate with natural hazards and have served to teach, preserve, and explain their occurrence. The importance of oral tradition for volcanological investigations has been also demonstrated in other Polynesian islands, such as Hawaii (cf., Swanson 2008).
Indigenous knowledge in the New Zealand context is termed “mātauranga māori”, and for this project would specifically be referred to as “mātauranga a Nāti Rangi”, referred to hereafter as mātauranga. Here, we will show how the body language (dance and other non-verbal forms clarified below, in the methodology chapter), in combination with other expressive forms (verbal language, writing, drawing) is a useful tool to bridge mātauranga and earth sciences. The integration of mātauranga, science, and arts served to (1) communicate the current understanding of geological and volcanological processes from multiple perspectives; (2) empower indigenous communities living on active volcanoes to increase their awareness; (3) develop a teaching tool for current and future generations, which can be used at different levels within the community. Furthermore, this method follows an adaptive management approach that allows iterative amendments, to ensure the tool remains relevant as societies and volcanoes change through time.
Mt. Ruapehu volcano geological context
Mt. Ruapehu is one of the most active stratovolcanoes of New Zealand (Cronin and Neall 1997). Located at the southern end of the Taupo Volcanic Zone, it has erupted low-K andesitic-dacitic magmas in effusive and explosive (from phreatic to Plinian) eruptions since ~270 ka (Donoghue et al. 1995, Pardo et al. 2012). The main edifice is asymmetrical; it comprises lava-flows, rare domes, and has been affected by events of sector collapse (cf., Palmer and Neall 1989, McClelland and Erwin 2003, Procter et al. 2010, Tost et al. 2014). The volcano is capped by small permanent glaciers and snowfields and comprises overlapping craters (Hackett and Houghton 1989, Cronin et al. 1996). Historical activity has been centred at the youngest South Crater, currently occupied by an acidic Crater Lake (Christenson and Wood 1993), from which lahar generation is common (e.g. Cronin and Neall 1997, Neall et al. 2001, Lube et al. 2009). Holocene eruptions have been predominantly phreatic, producing base surges and ballistic fallout, and phreatomagmatic, producing subplinian columns (Cronin et al. 1997, Kilgour et al. 2010).
Ngāti Rangi Iwi
“Whaia e au Manganui-o-te-ao kia tau au ki runga ō Ruapehu ki Ngā Turi ō Murimotu ko te Ahi-kā o Paerangi-i-te-Whare-Toka i puta mai ai Rangituhia, Rangiteauria me Uēnuku-Manawa-Wiri”. [Translates “I follow the Manganui o tea o river, I settle up on Ruapehu and the sacred alter of Nga Turi o Murimotu, the eternal flame of Paerangi, from hence we originate. Paerangi begat Rangituhia, Rangiteauria, and their sister Ueunuku Manawa Wiri”]. This is how Ngāti Rangi people introduce themselves, and intrinsically links their ancestry to the land, its geomorphology, and the flowing waters
The Ngāti Rangi Iwi falls under the mantle of Te Kāhui Maungā an identity, which encompasses the mountains of the district and its original inhabitants. The ancestors of Te Kāhui Maungā were the earliest inhabitants in the area, arriving before many other Māori (cf., Waitangi Tribunal, 2013). They were also known as the descendants of Paerangi-i-te-Moungaroa, also known as Paerangi-i-te-Whare-Toka. Paerangi is an ancestor of Ngāti Rangi, a chief who is described in the narratives as one of the first inhabitants of New Zealand (i.e., the “original people of the land”). The names of his daughters have specific meanings, Rangituhia meaning “written in the heavens”, Rangiteauria meaning “the joining of the heavens to the earth”, and Uenuku Manawa Wiri meaning “the rainbow, the anchorage of the pulsating heart”.
From the time of European arrival and settlement of the central North Island during 1800 Māori were recognised as the native inhabitants and custodians of the land. During the mid 1800s, increasing settlement and interest in New Zealand from overseas required land to be secured by the Crown for purchase. During this period, a Native Land Court collected a large amount of information on the connections that iwi (i.e., tribes) and individuals had with the land. Unfortunately, the Courts of the time were focused on ownership rather than tribal identity, history and traditional land tenure systems, resulting in individual cultural identity being overlooked, poorly recorded and not understood.
The events of the formation of the Tongariro National Park (comprising Mt. Ruapehu, Mt. Tongariro and Pihanga volcanoes; Figure 1) with the gifting of a 2 km radius of land around the peak of Mt. Ruapehu by Horonuku Te Heuheu, on behalf to the neighbouring Tūwharetoa tribe, also did not take into account Ngāti Rangi culture and status over their tribal region and ancestral maungā (mountain). Ngāti Rangi and other iwi from the Whanganui district (Figure 1a) strongly protested this action and asked for their areas to be subdivided out of the National Park. This was against the thinking of the current government and the National Park was established (cf., Waitangi Tribunal, 2013).
Ngāti Rangi, like many other maori tribes, has a rich belief system that has developed over the last 1000 years of occupation, with numerous spiritual and ritualistic practises that occur at different times and locations. A large number of these practises have disappeared due to the introduction of European culture and Christianity. However, several historical accounts that form the basis of Ngāti Rangi belief system are now publicly known and treated as stories, myths and legends.
Many of these stories have been over simplified over the years with many different versions being portrayed. Unfortunately, the real meanings behind many of these stories and practices have been lost or altered to be consistent with European beliefs. This has forced Ngāti Rangi to guard the remainder of their history and spiritual connections to their rohe pōtae (i.e. tribal homeland), to ensure that their mana (status) and principles are not disrespected and that they endure.
The connection Ngāti Rangi have with the maungā is highlighted in its name Te Kāhui Maungā ki Tangaroa. The name signifies both their connection to the creation of the land, their place of belonging (and the term used to describe their natural grouping or iwi) and the source of their awa/wai (river system) and mouri (Ngāti Rangi dialect for mauri, meaning Life Principle, Life Force; cf. Best 1982). Ngāti Rangi whakapapa (i.e., genealogy) refers to the people that fished up and created the North Island. Their spiritual beliefs centre on the atua (gods and spiritual guardians): Tangaroa (Guardian of the Ocean), Ranginui (Father Sky), Papatūānuku (Mother Earth), and Ruaumoko (Guardian of Earthquakes and Volcanoes, the youngest son of Rangi and Papa), all of them connected by water and before the island was “fished up” by the Polynesian demi-god Māui. The “fish” would breath through a hole or vent connected to the top of the South Island called ‘Te Ihungangana a Ruapehu i rō wai’; when fished up, the birth of Ruapehu calmed the fish.
Mt. Ruapehu later became known as Matua te Mana (the powerful one) with himself and the Te Wai-ā-moe, which refers to the Crater Lake, as the spring that brought forth life from Papatūānuku (Mother Earth), supplying spiritual and physical sustenance to the land and Ngāti Rangi.
Maori belief structure
The beliefs and values of Māori are based on their relationship with the natural environment and their influence on management. Primary values associated with land include: tikanga (customs) and whakapapa (genealogy), which form the basis of any kaupapa Māori (knowledge, skills, attitudes and values of Māori society) process. Other Māori environmental concepts such as tāonga (treasures), mouri (life force), wairua (spiritual health and wellbeing), kaitiaki (guardians), and ahi kā (unbroken connections) are important concepts used in environmental management to essentially monitor the state of the (cultural/Māori) environment or the interconnectedness. Kaitiakitanga (guardianship) is another more recent concept, which provides the framework to put into practice these concepts and applies them to today’s western management systems and legislation. Kaitiakitanga refers to the sustainable access, use, and conservation of natural resources, developed by a specific community occupying a particular geographical area (cf., Marsden 1992). None of these concepts form or relate to any legislation or policy that guides natural hazard identification or the emergency management process.
Kaupapa Māori research
Kaupapa Maori is the term used for the indigenous, epistemological research system in New Zealand, which includes the initiation, procedures, evaluations, construction and distribution of newly defined indigenous knowledge (cf., Bishop 1999, Moewaka Barnes 2000). Many indigenous cultures have traditionally occupied fertile, active volcanic areas. In New Zealand, Māori have observed and monitored, as well as responded to and recovered from, numerous hazardous (volcanic) events during the last ~800 years (Cashman and Cronin 2008; King et al. 2007, Severne 1995). The knowledge, referred to as mātauranga māori, gained from these experiences is rarely considered when scientifically identifying volcanic hazards, yet it does contain a unique, valid epistemology and data (Roberts 1995, Durie 1996, Durie 1998). By extracting and combining portions of both Māori and western science within an applied spatial context, utilising both scientific and kaupapa Māori frameworks (Smith 1990), we can begin to develop unique solutions to natural hazards and increase resilience to hazard events (cf., Rainforth et al. 2012).
We suggest that body language in combination with other forms of human expression, such as, fine arts, music and poetry, are highly effective tools to teach geological and volcanological concepts. By reconsidering the concept of “The body as a cultural object”, discussed by authors such as Foucault (1977), Mary Douglas (1973), (Merleau-Ponty 1945, In: Silverman 1976), and Gardner (1993), it is possible to develop different strategies using the body language to experience, adopt, and translate the scientific information. The concept of “body language” refers to the collective expressions, which use the physical body as the main subject of human perception, nonverbal expression, and communication (cf., Merleau-Ponty 1945, In: Silverman, 1976; Fran 1988). Body expression is conceived as an intrinsic human, non-verbal ability articulating personal sensitivity, thoughts, imagination, and creativity, complementing other expressive tools such as, talking, painting, and writing (cf., Stokoe and Schächter 1977). It has been recognized since the 1970s as a powerful pedagogical tool (Stokoe 1978), which encompasses the concepts of (1) free-style dance, as an individual search; (2) dance to move, to communicate, and to create or improvise (Kalmar 2006). In addition, body language is encompassed within the concept of “bodily knowledge”, also known as “somatic knowledge”, which is a wide pedagogical research field comprising the ways humans understand themselves and their environment through the body, and make meaning of the world through their bodily experiences (Green 2002).
For this project, we chose the Ngāti Rangi children as the main representatives of the tribe to work with. The reason for this selection was based on the hypothesis that children are (1) excellent receptors and questioners of knowledge, (2) participative in an innovative classroom, and (3) communicators to older generations by sharing their learning with their families. Also, children’s psychomotor abilities and development are expected to be better than in ordinary adults. We adapted the strategies explained below to the conditions of Ngāti Rangi population, which had one Māori medium primary school at Ohākune Te Kura Kaupapa Māori o Ngāti Rangi, which is taught between 80-100% in Te Reo Māori and comprised 20–26 students between 5 and 13 years old in 2012–2013 (grouped within two classrooms). The initial stage of the project consisted in meetings between the volcanologist and the Māori Principal of the primary school. In this phase, the volcanologist could learn about Ngāti Rangi history, the meaning of Mt. Ruapehu for the community, the relationship between the tribe and the volcano, and how Māori explain, understand and relate to the origin of the Universe, Planet Earth, and volcanic activity in general, and to Mt. Ruapehu, in particular. The questions from the Principal to the volcanologist were also raised in this initial phase, together with the main interests of the community around how volcanology could contribute to and straighten their knowledge system and practices. Since Mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge) is transmitted across generations through oral tradition (prayers, narratives and songs), the meetings served to clarify the meaning of the narratives, with particular attention to all Māori etymology and toponomy referring to Mt. Ruapehu and related activity.
From the first stage a rich database resulted, which helped to identify the concepts within the mātauranga that could overlap with western scientific (geological-volcanological) theories. From this process, a correlation between the indigenous and geological knowledge systems could be established and the main teaching subjects were selected: (1) The origin of the Universe, Solar System, and Planet Earth; (2) The Structure of the Earth; (3) Earth dynamics (covering tectonics, earthquakes, magma, and volcanic activity).
The third stage consisted in the design of multidisciplinary workshops focused on teaching geosciences by using the body language and knowledge developed in performing arts. The starting motive was always the Māori perception of each concept, followed by the presentation of the corresponding scientific point of view. The entire aim was to evidence the agreement between both systems and to bring about the need for respectful and reciprocal interactions between people, natural processes and resources to prevent disasters.
A series of five workshops were designed, each one consisting of: (1) an introductory session (~1 hour long) using different types of body expression exercises, including Contact-improvisation dance (Smith and Nelson 1997), theatre, and interpretative dance (Root-Bernstein and Root-Bernstein 2003, Servos 1981), improvisational playmaking and game-dynamics (Boal 1979, 2002). The traditional narratives were recreated (i.e., performed) during this sessions, by using them as motives and guides for the improvised body movement/expression. This activity was followed or alternated by a guided-dance part to first experience the physical processes addressed in each subject (e.g., The Origin of the Universe, of the Planet Earth and all forces of nature), in order to have an initial “empirical-somatic” comprehension of the phenomena before receiving the theoretical explanation. Therefore, the methodology is based on experiencing concepts and physical phenomena through the body movement, body expression, and by acquiring body knowledge at first. Contact-improvisation dance, for instance, is based on the improvisation that arises when two bodies establish contact, following the physical laws that govern their motion: gravity, momentum, and inertia. Therefore, it is an extremely useful technique to experience with the body these physical laws. The bodywork was occasionally shortly interrupted to reinforce the oral tradition and to provide the scientific explanation of the same experience.
(2) A session (~1 hour long) of interactive talks followed, to construct the concepts experienced with the body in the first session. The theoretical scientific background was explained in continuous feedback with the Māori view about the same processes. Audio-visual aids, such as images, videos, and power point presentations were used in this session to specify and clarify the concepts by visualizing real natural images or virtual models. This session had to be strongly interactive, allowing streams of questions asked by the children to be discussed and answered. (3) A subsequent practical session varied from observations directly in the field (on Mt. Ruapehu) to laboratory or hands-on exercises (e.g., construction of volcano models; Diet-Coke© and Mentos© experiment following Coffey 2008). (4) Collaborators (teachers and artists) conducted a further session, which varied according to the workshop. Learned key concepts were synthetized and posed as motives to produce other art forms, such as poetry, pictures, paintings, and songs. This activity (1 hour to several days) allowed further assimilation of the learned concepts. During all stages, a collection of existing and absent terms in Te reo Māori language was recorded, in order to build up a glossary of geological terms in the native tongue.
Finally, the documented process and artistic products were later used to (5) produce a teaching tool in video and power point presentation formats. This tool was left as a permanent resource to the school for continuing work with future generations. It was also given to other teachers, other members of Ngati Rangi community, and researchers conducting investigation on Māori culture, mātauranga, and risk mitigation strategies, to be used as an interactive tool in order to extend the process to the elder generations.
Mātauranga Māori (the Māori Knowledge System)
The meetings (hui) and conversations (kōrero) between volcanologists and the Princiapal focused on the Māori perception and their explanation about the Origin of the Universe, the Planet Earth, Earth dynamics, Mt. Ruapehu and the relationship between the tribe and the volcano. The discussions emphasized the concept of Kaitiakitanga (guardianship), which encompasses the philosophical and practical components that establish the local indigenous environmental ethics. By protecting and managing the land that Māori have been occupying over generations, where the community exercises authority for decisions made regarding the land (mana whenua) and manages natural resources, the guardianship enhances the health of valued species (mouri o ngā tāonga) and the local ecosystem (cf., Forster 2011). Therefore, Māori environmental theories and practices derive from long (hundreds of years) cultural and ecological relationships with their ancestral land.
Along with the unfolding universe, the ability of cosmic processes to give, but also, to destroy has been widely recognized by Māori. There, the concept of Tapu arises. It refers to the sacred and also to the forbidden places, activities, and things, and it is therefore used as a protective measure that establishes ethical and practical norms, also imposing a social control. Tapu is the Māori system to cultivate appreciation and respect for another human being, another form of life, and any life force (cf., Kowhai Consulting Ltd. 2004). Volcanic craters, crater lakes, geothermal springs, water springs, and other specific landscapes are tapu. For example, Ngāti Rangi refers to the Crater Lake on Ruapehu as Te Wai a Moe, the Sleeping Water, which is a place of Tapu. This is not trivial, since the most recently frequent eruptions of Ruapehu regard unpredictable phreatic events that may not significantly impact a large area, but certainly is a threat for visitors on the volcano slopes and crater rim. Likewise, a story about the origin of the Mangawhero River from a tear escaped from Ranginui as he got separated from his lover Papatūānuku could be used as a starting point to explain the different lahar triggering mechanisms. Similarly, the Rangipōs desert (Figure 1b) is also referred as Tapu, corresponding, from the volcanological perspective, to the proximal and medial locations of pyroclastic deposition during past, sustained Plinian and subplinian eruption columns. Tapu can be therefore considered as a native hazard mitigation strategy (cf., Tapuke et al. 2006, King et al., 2007, Grattan and Torrence 2010), which identifies a place as sacred and forbidden because it is known to be dangerous, ultimately discouraging people to approach (e.g., it regulates exposure to volcanic hazards).
A recurrent story within the Māori narratives regards the “Three baskets of knowledge”. In the story, the supreme creator Io gave these baskets to Tane, the god and guardian (kaitiaki) of the forests and direct ancestor of the human kind. The three baskets correspond to: (1) the knowledge beyond space and time, the ultimate, and unknown to us, reality; (2) the “womb of the universe”, the initial knowledge from which the universe originated; (3) “that before us”, corresponding to the knowledge that we acquire through the senses allowing the current understanding about the natural world around us. Within this context, the Māori education system develops, providing the first principles or ground rules, and the customs from which “one would guide oneself” (cf., Kowhai Consulting Ltd. 2004). This “living and behaviour guide” is transmitted throughout generations through the karakia (prayers), waiata (songs), kōrero (oral stories), and other forms of performing arts collectively named Kapa-Haka.
Ngāti Rangi’s starting point when approaching any discussion about Mt. Ruapehu was their karakia (prayer) to the volcano, titled “He Ruruku: Mai ara ra!” (Appendix 1). The prayer recalls the tribe’s genealogical link to Mt. Ruapehu, which is not simply described as a geomorphological accident consisting of Rua (two) Pehu (craters), but is mainly referred as: (1) Koro (Grandfather), (2) Matua te Mana (The powerful progenitor), and (3) Te Whare Toka o Paerangi (The house of stone of Paerangi, their ancestor).
The karakia mentions the “Mountain Clan”, which refers to Mt. Ruapehu (Matua te Mana-Absolute Wisdom), Mt. Tongariro (Matua te Toa - Absolute Warrior), Ngāuruhoe (Matua te Pononga-Absolute Negotiator), Pihanga (Matua te Hine-Absolute Feminine), and Mt. Taranaki (Matua te Tapu-Absolute Sacredness) (Figure 1b). The Māori story explains the actual distribution of the volcanoes, with Mt. Taranaki location offset to the west coast and detached from the N-S volcanic trend within the Central Volcanic Pleateau. These volcanoes conformed the ancestral mountain clan and originally lived together in the central North Island. Pihanga represents the only female character and was engaged with Tongariro. However, a love affair with Taranaki provoked conflict, from which Tongariro got furious and finally “blew his top”. Within the Ngāti Rangi version of this story, Ruapehu, Koro (the grandfather), watched the scene with worry and decided to send Mt. Taranaki (who was responsible for the sacred kōrero of the clan) to the west, with the responsibility to “be the guardian of the setting sun”. From there, he cries whenever he reminds Pihanga and sends his caresses from the West in the form of clouds. The story clearly places Ruapehu as the wise elder, Matua te Mana, who protects Ngāti Rangi from the force of Tongariro. Although we could not completely confirm the entire story with geological evidence, Mt. Ruapehu Plinian eruptions (>27-11 ka cal. BP) are older than Tongariro largest explosive events (>10-7 ka cal BP). Also, the shape of Mt. Tongariro has progressively changed with time as violent eruptions and sector collapses have occurred (cf., Donoghue et al., 1995; Cronin and Neall, 1997; Narin et al. 1998; Moebis et al., 2011).
Ruapehu also plays a central role in Ngāti Rangi songs and other stories, where it is referred as the shining scale of the Great Fish caught by Māui (Polynesian demigod), which subsequently became the North Island of New Zealand (Te Ika o Māui; cf., Te Ahukaramū Charles Royal 2012). From the conversations, it was clearly understood that from the Māori perspective, the land and the volcano clearly preceded human occupation in the cosmogony.
Mt. Ruapehu is therefore considered one of the ancestors who provides benefits to the tribe and regulates the balance of their territory. “If he needs to do his mahi (job) then we need to let him. He needs to do what he needs to do”. Ngāti Rangi permanently emphasized this perception about the volcano, constantly repeating that the tribe does not consider Ruapehu as a hazard; indeed, Ngāti Rangi asked volcanologists to avoid this term from the beginning of this project. During the meetings there was a recurrent message reinforcing the tribe’s lack of fear in front of volcanic activity of Ruapehu, and the strong acknowledgement for all the benefits provided by the volcano, which included: (1) Their water resources, embracing rivers, water springs, the Crater Lake, and the Rotokura lake (located on the SE ring-plain of Ruapehu and considered to hold water with healing properties). (2) The ski field, which is the main source of economical and recreational activities during winter. (3) The productive volcanic soils, and (4) protection from the eruptions of Tongariro (last erupted in 2012; Jolly and Cronin 2014).
Bridging Māori and western-gescience systems
Comparative table showing the analogy between Māori knowledge system ( Mātauranga Māori ) and Western Geosciences
Mātauranga Māori: Empirical and spiritual methods, inherited tradition and costums
Astrophysics, Geology, Palaeontology, Biology, Archaeology, Anthropology
The three baskets of knowledge
Principle of Uniformitarianism, Law of Superposition, non-linearity of Space-Time
Atua: ancestors (divinities) with influence over particular domains
Mouri: the principle of life-force or essence within all animate and inanimate things, and resulting interconnection between all forms of life. It is the power that creates unity in diversity, the binding power that unifies.
Dark energy, principles of thermodynamics
Hihiri: absolute energy, a form of illumination or aura, which appears in all living things
Electromagnetic and gravity fields
Mouri-Ora: the life principle existing in animate and inanimate things and remains with them throughout its existence.
a) Earth Physics (dynamics): convection within Earth Nucleus and Mantle, Plate Tectonics, the Rock cycle, earthquakes, orogeny, volcanic activity, atmospheric processes, formation of soils, crystals.
b) Living things: Genetic code
Male and Female principles
Papatūānuku: Mother Earth as a living being
Planet Earth: Dynamic System
Ruaumoko: god of earthquakes and volcanoes represented as the youngest son of Papatuanuku and living underneath her.
Earth’s core and mantle convection, Plate tectonics
Kaitiaki: divinities created by the love of Papatūānuku (Earth, female principle) and Ranginui (Sky, male principle). Some of the most mentioned in the narratives are Tangaroa (god of oceans), Tawhirimatea (god of winds), Tanemahuta (god of forests), Whiro (darkness, god in charge of illness, strengthen by death)
Natural forces and cycles
Kaitiakitanga: Active, interdependent relationship between Atua, natural resources, ancestors, present human generation. It considers the inhabitants knowledge of the physical space and the “layers of events and relationships that have occurred in that area over time” (Forster, 2011).
Ecology, Environmental Sciences, Stratigraphy, History
Tāne Mahuta, the direct ancestor of Man: humans and trees are genetically related
The Human being and trees share some DNA
Mana whenua: the potential of the land
The ability of the land to produce the benefits of nature. It is linked to environmental conservation, land distribution
Matua Te Mana, Koro, Te Whare Toka o Paerangi: name of Mt. Ruapehu, considered as Ngati Rangi ancestor
Mt. Ruapehu: the most active inland volcano of New Zealand.
Ka Ora tenei whenua: Mt. Ruapehu protects the tribe, provides healing water, rivers, soils, snow
Benefits from volcanoes, including: (1) Main water sources for Ngati Rangi territory, (2) Soils fertilization from degradation of volcanic ash, (3) contribution to Earth’s atmosphere composition, (4) Tourism
The mahi (job) of volcanoes, needed to maintain the life, natural cycles, processes, and the world as we know it
Vulnerability and Risk perception and management
Ngati Rangi Iwi identity and awareness of their geologically active environment
For example, the genealogy from creation to mankind detailed by Mātauranga Māori, starting from the root-cause, the original void, and developing into the expansion energy, primordial memory, sub-conscious wisdom, and the seed-word breath of life, can have an equivalent in science, starting from the Big Bang, and developing into the formation, replication, transcription, and translation of DNA. Similarly, the Māori notion about the unfolding of life is comparable to the scientific theory of evolution and the typical spiral representation of the geological time.
In the resulting integrative map (Figure 4), the lessons from the past experiences and from the observation of the present moment play a role in the mental projection of the future. From the mythological point of view, past experiences are lessons for present generations; from the scientific, geological point of view, the observations of current processes are the key to reconstruct the past events (Principle of Uniformitarianism). Both systems look forward to study trends and envisage the future (events/generations), which is a key procedure to design strategies for risk mitigation and emergency planning.
Workshops for Māori children
Through the development of the conceptual map (Figure 4; Table 1), the idea of humans as part of the environment, rather than separated from natural processes was reinforced, and a sense of responsible participation could be shown and shared with children. The co-validation of Mātauranga Māori and western Geosciences aimed to reach an agreement between both perceptions, which helped to design four, one-day long workshops (one per school-term), where geology could be taught without interfering but nurturing and being nurtured by the traditional Māori understanding.
First Workshop design: Te whakapapa o Papatūānuku (From the Big Bang to the Origin of Planet Earth)
Body-Language teaching technique
1. Te whakapapa o Papatūānuku (The Genealogy of The Earth): Introductory workshop
Theatre-dance and somatic dance: māori and/or the scientific story performing through body sensitization. By guided attention, an exploration of the physical sensations was directed while building up the narrative of the origin of the Universe and the Earth. The movement was connected with feelings, findings, needs, desires (e.g., the need of light and order in the cosmos, the desire of expansion and space). Rarely the children needed to imitate the teacher and most of the time, a free-style movement was established in order to focus attention on the individual processes. According to the physical laws experienced with the body (i.e., gravity, momentum, inertia) and the image or narrative given by the instructor, the scientific explanation was provided either during the dance or in short pauses used for discussion circles. At the end of the movement-session a talk-circle served to construct concepts through the interactive discussion between teachers and students.
Te Kore, transition from Te Pō to Te Ao Mārama
Expansion of the Universe (Big Bang)
Laying down with closed-eyes, starting to explore the ground and describe textures, temperature, solidity, the feeling of darkness and confusion. Then, continuing the exploration with open-eyes and feel the difference. Slowly start to explore the space in the vertical direction while changing levels (from the floor to standing), experiencing the force of gravity, inertia, and momentum.
Jen Hyde-Independent Performing artists, expert in Acro-yoga, Circus, Theater of the oppressed, Games, and Teaching for social justice
1) Matter and Energy. Physical particles and their interactions: collision, rejection, bonding, fusion. 2) Stellar nucleosynthesis, and Origin of Life.
Changing Partner games: (1) Find a partner in the space and establish short interactions (e.g., establish eye-contact for a few seconds and approach without touching, then leave-to feel magnetism-reject, collide, make bonds). (2) Find a partner and play mirrors for a few seconds. With these exercises we aimed to reproduce all possible particle interactions in the space after the Big Bang. A group of children start to come close together until forming a cluster, feeling gravity and density, and guide them towards liberating themselves from that, recreating how stars are born.
1) Images about nebulae, star dust, galaxies and you-tube videos about star formation and the origin of the Solar System and planets. 2) Te Koru, an unfolding spiral representing the Maori evolution of the Universe, and Geological time in Science.
The activities above are done at different speeds, including stopping the movement.
Laws of Thermodynamics
Explained from activities above.
Forces: Gravity, Magnetism, Electricity, Nuclear Force
Moving in the space while feeling the centre of gravity, experiencing what happens when changing levels.
Separation between Papatūānuku and Ranginui
Representation by teachers and collaborators using acro-yoga techniques
States of Matter: liquid, solid, gas–vapor
Free-dance experiencing/performing the states of water when changing temperature
The Origin of the Solar System and planets
A group of children form a central cluster (Sun), by making a circle holding hands and recreating collapse, explosion, rotation, initiation of the Star. In the meantime, the rest of the children stay around, individually moving in circles, as asteroids. Careful creation of larger clusters (planetoids) by embracing children along selected orbits, adding more “mass to each planet”
Planet Earth: location in the Solar System and Structure
Closed-eyes sensitivity by doing an imaginary trip from the Earth’s core towards the surface, feeling all the Earth’s layers beneath us.
An apple was used to visualize the proportions of potable water and soils.
After explaining the Earth’s Structure, the attention focused on the nature, scale, and value of water and the soil.
1. Te whakapapa o Papatūānuku (The Genealogy of The Earth): Introductory workshop [continued]
Introduction to Ruaumoko
Stress and stress-release: earthquakes and volcanic eruptions need to happen to guarantee natural cycles and Life on Earth as we know it
Stretching exercises in partners, feeling tension and its release, weight and its release.
Field-visit: a short excursion to the Eastern Ring Plain of Ruapehu to learn how to identify East, South, West, and North at Onetapu, one of Ngāti Rangi sacred places. Identification of the surrounding volcanoes: Mt. Tongariro, Mt. Ngauruhoe, Mt. Ruapehu. Visit to a small valley to recognize the volcanic deposits of Ruapehu, learn how to read the geological history. The children were able to connect the morning dance exercises and recognized that pumice is solidified magma, and its voids are the bubbles.
Each student wrote a poem in native language about Papatūānuku, natural forces, and the need of volcanic eruptions to support Life. Each poem was accompanied by pictures taken by them during the workshop, and an exhibition in the classroom followed.
Jen Hyde-Independent Performing artists, expert in Acro-yoga, Circus, Theater of the oppressed, Games, and Teaching for social justice
Magma, formation of gas bubbles within magma, volcanic eruptions, and pumice rocks and obsidian
Guided movement and somatic dance, feeling as if we were “magma”, detailing what a viscous behaviour is, the formation of a gas bubble, and the bursting response of the bubble when subject to decompression.
Cardinal directios, orientation, and coordinates
Stratigraphy: how we read the story of the Earth by using the Principle of Uniformitarianism and the Law of Superposition. The analogue of the rivers “carving the skin of Papatūānuku” helped to explain river incision and the outcrops of horizontal tephra beds.
Second Workshop design: Ruaumoko shakes (An introduction to Earth dynamics and earthquakes)
Body-Language teaching technique
Example bodywork exercises
2. Ruaumoko shakes: introduction to earthquakes and seismic activity
Guided movement to recreate the return to the original void, darkness, space.
Mai ara rā!
Review of the Big Bang and Earth Structure.
Short version of the corresponding activity of workshop 1.
1) New vocabulary in English and Māori languages. 2) Art-piece: a sculptured series of paintings displayed as P, S, and R-seismic waves
Other Te Kaupapa o Ngāti Rangi teachers
Papatūānuku’s stress and forces
Stress and stress-release: earthquakes and volcanic eruptions need to happen to guarantee natural cycles and Life on Earth
Stretching exercises in partners, feeling tension and its release, weight and its release. Contact-Improvisation exercises to experience: gravity, push, pull, roll, slide.
Class showing videos
and pictures about the Earth structure, mantle convection, tectonic plates, and emphasis on Subduction processes.
A round of questions from teachers aimed
to reinforce and synthetize the lessons. This activity was mingled with traditional songs.
Guided movement recreating mantle convection.
Ruaumoko’s job (mahi) inside Papatūānuku
Free-style movement to experience the response of matter (strain) to stress.
Crustal strain and stress, and introduction to earthquakes
Free-style fluid, plastic, elastic, and fragile behavior with movements.
Game with a rope to recreate P, S, and R-seismic waves.
Game: one kid personified Ruaumoko triggering earthquakes, and a team of children represented the crust responding to the seismic waves by rolling, folding, pushing, sliding, until creating mountains.
Third Workshop design: Te Whare Toka ō Paerangi (A look to the Tectonic Rock Cycle)
Body-Language teaching technique
3. Te Whare Toka o Paerangi (Mt. Ruapehu: Paerangi’s house of stone)
Theatre-dance: māori and/or the scientific story performing through body sensitization and somatic dance exercises. A free-style movement was guided to recreate the tectonic Rock Cycle, the action of water and wind on rocks. According to the physical processes experienced with the body, the scientific explanation was provided either during the dance or in short pauses used for discussion circles. At the end of the movement-session a discussion circle served to construct concepts about igneous and sedimentary rocks, erosion, metamorphic rocks, and the tectonic rock cycle as Earth’s recycling processes.
Ruaumoko, Te Whare toka o Paerangi
Earth Dynamics, Surface processes and the Tectonic Rock Cycle.
Lesson in the classroom drawing the Rock-Cycle process and explaining each step. This explanation occurred with continuous questioning from the students.
Laboratory class: children were grouped in different teams according to age. A rock sample representing each rock-type was given to each group for observation and description. The teacher provided the name of each rock, and a representative of each team exposed the observations and the location of each rock within the cycle to the rest of the teams. An additional aid was the exhibition of thin-section pictures of each rock-type on a screen.
Pictures and new vocabulary.
Fourth Workshop design: Matua te Mana and crystals (Magma and introduction to volcanic eruptions)
Body-Language teaching technique
Example bodywork excercises
4 . Matua te Mana , Magma and Crystals
Somatic dance followed by guided choreography
Mouri, Mana, Mahi
Atoms, Atomic bonds, Molecules, molecule vibration within the solid state of matter
The lyrics of a song dedicated to Matua Te Mana, Te Whare toka o Paerangi, and all the interdependence of the Iwi and Mt. Ruapehu.
Matiu Te Huki-musician and kapa haka teacher. He composed the music, guided the creation of the lyrics, and carried on the final edition and recording of “Ko Matua te Mana” song (Te Huki 2013)
Somatic dance and guided movement to recreate rock melting, magma genesis, magma chamber, magma partial crystallization, magma ascent, vesiculation, and eruption.
Papatūānuku, Ruaumoko, Matua te Mana, Te Whare toka o Paerangi, healing properties of crystals
While describing the physical properties of the magma children can “dance” these properties. With the imagination, children feel they are magma within the chamber, changing from being molten, to crystals, to bubbles. Each state is linked to a change in the physical conditions of the magma.
Experiments with Diet Coke and Mentos, following Coffey (2008)
Guided movement: recreation of crystal structures with our bodies.
Large megacrysts were brought to the classroom. The properties of each crystal/mineral were explained followed by a direct observation and sensorial experience with each crystals per group of 4 to 5 students.
Build-up each structure type with the bodies: one body equals one atom, and ropes were used to connect atoms. Then two lines were set up to explain the properties of crystals: mirror axis, planes of symmetry, centre of symmetry.
Somatic dance and guided movement to recreate effusive and explosive eruptions, bubble burst and lava flows.
Volcanic eruptions: Explosive vs. Effusive
Lesson in the classroom with videos of real volcanic events and virtual models
Fifth Workshop design: Te mahi o Ruapehu (Volcanic products: events, deposits, and benefits)
Body-Language teaching technique
Example bodywork exercises
5. Te mahi o Ruapehu
Somatic dance followed by guided choreography
Te mahi o Ruaumoko, Te Whare toka o Paerangi
Volcanic products: lavas, pyroclastic falls, Pyroclastic density currents (PDCs), lahars, debris-avalanche
A choreography was directed to represent (1) dome formation, and implied viscous-rigid behavior, (2) dome explosion and tephra fall dispersion, (3) eruption column collapse and the generation of PDCs. Then the teacher would detonate the first eruption at one team of students recreating eruption activity (1). They would select the next team, who would trigger activity (2), and so on with activities (3) and back to (1). A cycle of eruptions could be recreated and the implied processes were explained (e.g., Dome explosion would lead to Eruption column with ash dispersal, then eruption column collapse; after the gas got exhausted, a new generation of domes would grow).
Lesson in the classroom with videos of real volcanic events and virtual models showing: difference between effusive and explosive eruptions, ballistics, sustained eruption columns, ash-plumes, Pyroclastic Density Currents (flows and surges), lahars, edifice sector-collapse, and production of debris-avalanche.
A model of wheat, baking powder, and water volcano can be created to explore different magma viscosities (Acknowledgement to James Cowlyn and Ben Kennedy-University of Canterbury, New Zealand)
Ana Gabriela Mar Sarabia. Children psychotherapist specialized in dance-therapy and Hata yoga teacher
The Mountain's clan
Relationship of the volcanoes in New Zealand to the Subduction along the Kermadec trench
Tongariro blew his head
Explosive eruptions modify the shape of the volcanoes
Crater Lake, phreatic and phreatomagmatic eruptions
Onetapu and the Origin of Mangawhero River
Lahar triggering mechanisms: eruptive and non-eruptive
Rangipōs desert considered as Tapu
Rangipō desert is under the dispersal axis of major (Plinian) past fallouts
Ka Ora, Kaitiakitanga
Volcanic benefits (water sources, geothermal springs, fertile soils), Environmental Geology
Interactive discussion about the benefits the tribe receives from Mt. Ruapehu
The video was launched and given to the children so that they could see all their integrated artwork and dance around their sacred volcano.
As described above, all workshops included an initial session of bodywork by integrating Contact-Improvisation dance, partner-yoga, and somatic-dance exercises, which provided a guided, free-style movement with scientific and traditional native contents (here called Earth-Contact Dance). The images, movements, and questions driven by the instructor pulled out the attention towards observation of the own body and construction of empirical knowledge. After the physical sensations were explored through the body language the children had time to narrate their perceptions. From here, the physical-laws and geological concepts were constructed together with the teachers, making always the paragon with Māori knowledge. The process resulted in a continuous creative education practice during which the teacher was constantly inducing research by the students. Rather than limiting the lessons to a unidirectional talk by the teacher, the permanent thinking-induction through questions to the children allowed the construction of concepts by themselves. The emotion triggered through this process allowed the assimilation of the learned concepts and the motivation to share their new findings with their families, promoting communication to elder generations.
Because of the conditions of this project, the guided movement and scientific explanations were given first in English, followed by the translation in Te reo Māori to assure comprehension.
The results were surprisingly positive because of the highly active participation and creativity of Ngāti Rangi students. Throughout frequent questions along the entire project we could confirm the appropriation of geological and traditional knowledge without conflict.
Resulting tangible products include a collection of poems, paintings, crafts, pictures, and a song. These products were integrated within a video and a power-point presentation formats, as a teaching tool for children and adults (being adaptable to all levels), for future generations.
Expectations from the teaching tool
The didactic video/.ppt resource prepared for Ngāti Rangi Iwi is a continuous process, a compilation of visual and auditory material to provide insight into knowledge platforms uniting Ngāti Rangi historical and intellectual tenets, code of conservation beliefs and practices, and Geosciences. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of Ngāti Rangi knowledge, history, and contemporary teaching sources (poems and songs) in a learning atmosphere that engaged the children at primary school.
The following points below highlight some discussion points, which can be used for the development, integrated learning to produce a Ngāti Rangi geoscience resource. It provides a starting point to develop an entire glossary of geological terms in the native language, providing an instrument to support native language revitalisation, reclamation, and regeneration. It could be also used as a tool to inspire new songs, poems, dances, and theatre plays within the local art style, nurturing the tradition and knowledge for future generations. It ultimately brings an opportunity for Ngāti Rangi to lead in worldwide efforts to reinforce the capabilities of indigenous communities to manage volcanic risk reduction.
The message from Ngāti Rangi to the scientific community
Forced evacuation and displacements of native people away from their ancestral land impact their entire social, cultural, economical, and ecological network, which may increase their vulnerability in future events. Rather than imposing the results of western science and governmental decisions on indigenous communities exposed to volcanic activity, the participation of the community and the recognition of their own, empirical knowledge developed throughout generations of land occupation may be a better way to decrease social vulnerability. Empowering native and scientific community awareness and cooperative prevention strategies during volcanic repose periods, may enhance concerted participation in emergency planning and response.
This project showed how traditional knowledge and western, modern sciences are not necessarily exclusive or in conflict. Their integration can in fact be a powerful education tool to empower native communities to actively contribute to volcanic risk mitigation strategies, and take their insights abroad to other indigenous and non-indigenous groups and institutions leading to disasters prevention. Specifically, the Ngāti Rangi objection to referring to volcanic activity of Mt. Ruapehu as a “hazard” (with a potential negative outcome) is an invitation to the scientific and governmental communities to include traditional knowledge within emergency planning strategies. The tribe emphasized a perception about the volcanic activity, which has been more likely to produce benefits than disasters over generations. Within this point of view, the Māori community asks scientists and government to guide human kind behavior, politics, and decisions by considering that it is not about controlling the Earth and natural processes, but about living in harmony with volcanism. In a sense, this is an invitation to use science in a way that supports the traditional conservation practices and that proposes mitigation strategies worked within consensus with the local native communities. The ultimate aim is to reduce vulnerability and optimize social response during volcanic crises.
By using the “body” as the mirror of our own point of view about the world rather than being an object in the world (Merleau-Ponty 1945), it is possible to understand scientific ideas by experiencing and feeling them first, and then by adding words to the given information to construct concepts. We showed how physical processes and concepts, such as the principles of thermodynamics, the origin of the Solar System and formation of Planet Earth, as well as how earthquakes and volcanoes work can be recreated and experienced through basic exercises of Contact-Improvisation dance, somatic dance, games, and other ludic activities based on body language and bodily knowledge. We showed how the resulting Earth-Contact Dance could bridge languages that could be misinterpreted as contradictory, such as native traditional belief systems and western earth sciences, to create a new way of looking at volcanic activity and hazard.
Blending traditional indigenous and scientific knowledge systems reduces social vulnerability by: (1) increasing awareness of volcanic phenomena by the local indigenous communities, (2) increasing awareness of scientists and government about the cultural and vital relationship between the communities and volcanoes, and (3) providing a better environment for active community participation and potential positive response during emergency management. The integrative approach can contribute to living safely with active volcanoes and reducing risk, during eruptive and non-eruptive periods.
This project would not have been possible without the active participation and collaboration of all the students at Te Kura Kaupapa Māori o Ngāti Rangi (Ngāti Rangi Primary school at Ohākune, New Zealand) between 2012 and 2013. Similarly, we acknowledge Che Wilson (Ngāti Rangi Trust), Kate Arentsen (Massey University), and all the staff of Te Kaupapa o Ngāti Rangi. Special gratitude to all the artists and external pedagogical collaborators who nurtured the workshops with great creativity and support: Matiu Te Huki, Jen Hyde, and Ana GM Sarabia. We gratefully thank Professor John Ham (Hīrangi School, Tūrangi, New Zealand) for requiring, facilitating, and nurturing the development of similar, short workshops at Te Kura o Hīrangi in 2013 (after Mt. Tongariro eruption 2012). He also enriched the discussions about the method. Hanna Rainforth (Ngāti Rangi Trust), Garth Harmsworth (New Zealand Landcare Research), Javier Agustín-Flores, and Professor Shane Cronin (Massey University), are also thanked for their valuable comments, suggestions, and support.
- Alexander DE (1993) Natural Disasters. University College London Press, Kluwer, Dordrecht/London, p 632Google Scholar
- Anderson EN (1996) Ecologies of the heart: emotion, belief and the environment. Oxford University Press, New York, p 272Google Scholar
- Berkers F, Kislalioglu M, Folke C, Gadgil M (1998) Exploring the Basic Ecological Unit: Ecosystem-like Concepts in Traditional Societies. Ecosystems 1:409–415View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Best E (1982) Maori religion and mythology being an account of the cosmogony, anthropogeny, religion beliefs and rites, magic, and folk lore of the maori folk of new Zealand. Part 2. New Zealand Electronic Text Collection Te Puhikotuhi o Aotearoa. PD Hasselberg, Government Printer, Wellington, New Zealand, p 682Google Scholar
- Bishop R (1999) Kaupapa Maori Research: An indigenous approach to creating knowledge. In: Robertson N (ed) Maori and psychology: research and practice - The proceedings of a symposium sponsered by the Maori and Psychology Research Unit. Maori & Psychology Research Unit, Hamilton, pp 1–6Google Scholar
- Boal A (1979) Theatre of the Oppressed. Pluto Press Limited, Australia, 184Google Scholar
- Boal A (2002) Games for actors and non-actors. Roudlesge, London, p 301Google Scholar
- Cashman KV, Cronin SJ (2008) Welcoming a monster to the world: Myths, oral tradition, and modern societal response to volcanic disasters. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 176:407–418View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Coffey TS (2008) Diet Coke and Mentos: What is really behind this physical reaction? Am H Phys 76(6):551–557View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Christenson BW, Wood CP (1993) Evolution of a vent-hosted hydro- thermal system beneath Ruapehu Crater Lake, New Zealand. Bull Volcanol 55:547–565View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cronin SJ, Neall VE, Palmer AS (1996) Geological history of the northeastern ring plain of Ruapehu volcano, New Zealand. Quat Int 34(36):21–28View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cronin SJ, Neall VE (1997) A late Quaternary stratigraphic framework for the northeastern Ruapehu and eastern Tongariro ring plains, New Zealand. N Z J Geol Geophys 40:179–191Google Scholar
- Cronin SJ, Hodgson KA, Neall VE, Palmer AS, Lecointre JA (1997) 1995 Ruapehu lahars in relation to the late Holocene lahars of Whangaehu River, New Zealand. N Z J Geol Geophys 40:507–520View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cronin SJ, Cashman KV (2008) Volcanic oral traditions in hazard assessment and mitigation. In: Gratton J, Torrence R (eds) Living under the shadow: Cultural impacst of volcanic eruptions. Left Coast Press, CA, pp 165–176Google Scholar
- Donoghue SL, Neall VE, Palmer AS (1995) Stratigraphy and chronology of late Quaternary andesitic tephra deposits, Tongariro Volcanic Centre, New Zealand. R Soc N Z 25(2):112–206Google Scholar
- Douglas M (1973) Natural Symbols, Exploration in Cosmology. Routledge, New York, p 177Google Scholar
- Durie MH (1996) Mātauranga Māori: Iwi and the Crown: A Discussion Paper. Paper prepared for mātauranga Māori hui. James Henare Māori Research Centre, University of Auckland, pp 1–4, 26 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
- Durie MH (1998) Mana, Te Kawanatanga: The Politics of Māori Self-determination. Oxford University Press, AucklandGoogle Scholar
- Feiring B (2013) Indigenous peoples’ rights to lands, territories and resources. International Land Coalition, Rome, p 94Google Scholar
- Forster M (2011) Kaitiakitanga: A Māori Environmental Ethic. In: Tomlins-Jahnke H, Mulholland M (eds) Mana Tangata, Politics of Empowerment. Huia Publishers, New Zealand, pp 221–241Google Scholar
- Foucault M (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan, vol 1975. Allen Lane, Penguin. First published in French as Surveiller et punir, Gallimard, Paris London, p 333Google Scholar
- Fran JL (1988) Dance/Movement Theraphy. A healing art. National Dance Association and American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance., p 354, ISBN-0-88314-380-1Google Scholar
- Gardner SB (1993) “Still iving flesh”: Beckett, Merleau-Ponty, and the Phenomenological Body. Theatr J 45:443–460View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grattan J, Torrence R (2010) Volcanic Oral Traditions in Hazard Assessment and Mitigation. In: Living under the shadow: cultural impacts of volcanic eruptions. Left Coast Press., pp 172–202Google Scholar
- Green J (2002) Somatic knowledge: The body as content and methodology in dance education. J Dance Educ 2(4):114–118View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (1995) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press -Nature, New York, p 593Google Scholar
- Hackett WR, Houghton BF (1989) A facies model for a Quaternary andesitic composite volcano, Ruapehu, New Zealand. Bull Volcanol 51:51–68View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jolly AD, Cronin SJ (2014) From eruption to end-user; bridging the science-managment interface during the 2012 Te Maari eruption, Tongariro Volcano, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 286:183View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kalmar D (2006) Que es la expression corporal: a partir de la corriente de trabajo creada por Patricia Stokoe. Lumen Humanitas Ed, Buenos Aires, Argenitina, 176Google Scholar
- Kilgour G, Manville V, Della Pasqua F, Graettinger A, Hodgson KA, Jolly GE (2010) The 25 September 2007 eruption of Mount Ruapehu, New Zealand: directed ballistics, surtseyan jets, and ice-slurry lahars. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 191:1–14View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- King DNT, Goff J, Skipper A (2007) Māori Environmental Knowledge and natural hazards in Aotearoa-New Zealand. J R Soc N Z 37(2):59–73View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- King DNT, Skipper A, Tawhai WBM (2008) Māori Environmental Knowledge of local weather and climate change in Aotearoa-New Zealand. Climate Change 90:385–409View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kowhai Consulting Ltd (2004) Certificate in Iwi Environmental Management and Trusteeship: Kaitiakitanga. Te Wānanga o Aotearoa., p 57Google Scholar
- Lowe DJ, Newnham RM, McCraw JD (2002) Volcanism and early Māori society in New Zealand. In: Torrence R, Grattan J (eds) Natural disasters and cultural change. Routledge, London, England, pp 126–161Google Scholar
- Lube G, Cronin SJ, Procter J (2009) Explaining the extreme mobility of volcanic ice-slurry flows, Ruapehu volcano. New Zealand Geol 37(1):15–18Google Scholar
- Ludwig D, Hilborn R, Walters C (1993) Uncertainty, resource exploitation and conservation: lessons from history. Science (Washington) 260:17–36View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marsden M (1988) The Natural World and Natural Resources: Māori Value Systems and Perspective Māori. Resource Management Law Reform Working paper no. 29, Part A. Ministry for the Environment, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- Marsden M (1992) Kaitiakitanga: a definitive introduction to the holistic worldview of the Māori. In: Royal TAC (ed) The Woven Universe: Selected writings of Rev. Māori Marsden. Te Wānanga-o-Rawkawa, ŌtakiGoogle Scholar
- McClelland E, Erwin PS (2003) Was a dacite dome implicated in the 9,500 B.P. Collapse of Mt Ruapehu? A palaeomagnetic investiga- tion. Bull Volcanol 65:294–305View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Merleau-Ponty M (1945) Phenomenology of Perception, Gallimard (ed). Translated by Colin Smith, New York: Humanities Press, 1962; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962; translation revised by Forrest Williams (1981), 469p.Google Scholar
- Moebis A, Cronin SJ, Neall VE, Smith IE (2011) Unravelling a complex volcanic history from fine-grained, intricate Holocene ash sequences at the Tongariro Volcanic Centre, New Zealand. Quatern Int 246:352–363View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moewaka Barnes H (2000) Kaupapa maori: explaining the ordinary. Whariki Research Group, University of Auckland. Pacific Health Dialog 7:13–16Google Scholar
- Narin IA, Kobayashi T, Nakagawa M (1998) The ~10ka multiple vent pyroclastic eruption sequence at Tongariro Volcanic Centre, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand: Part 1. Eruptive processes during regional extension. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 86:19–44View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neall VE, Cronin SJ, Donoghue SL, Hodgson KA, Lecointre JA, Palmer AS, Purves AM, Stewart RB (2001) Lahar hazards map for Ruapehu volcano. Institute of Natural Resources–Massey University, Soil and Earth Sciences Occasional Publication No. 1Google Scholar
- Palmer BA, Neall VE (1989) The Murimotu Formation, 9500 years old deposits of a debris avalanche and associated lahars, Mount Ruapehu, New Zealand. NZ J Geol Geophys 32:477–486View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pardo N, Cronin SJ, Palmer A, Németh K (2012) Reconstructing the largest explosive eruptions of Mt. Ruapehu, New Zealand: lithos- tratigraphic tools to understand subplinian-Plinian eruptions at andesitic volcanoes. Bull Volcanol 74:617–640View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paton D, Millar M, Johnston D (2001) Community Resilience to Volcanic Hazard Consequences. Nat Hazards 24:157–169View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paton D, Smith L, Daly M, Johnston D (2008) Risk perception and volcanic hazard mitigation Individual and social perspectives. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172:179–188View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Procter JN, Cronin SJ, Zernack AV (2010) Landscape and sedimentary response to catastrophic debris avalanches, Western Taranaki, New Zealand. Sediment Geol 38(1):67–70Google Scholar
- Rainforth H, Procter J, Black T, Harmsworth G, Pardo N (2012) Exploring indigenous knowledge for assessing volcanic hazards and improving monitoring approaches. Abstracts Cities on Volcanoes 7, Colima, México.Google Scholar
- Roberts M (1997) Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management Systems: Past, Present and Future Perspectives, draft paper. In: Williams D (ed) Mātauranga Māori and Tāonga: The nature and extent of Treaty rights held by iwi and hapū (I Indigenous flora and fauna; II Cultural heritage objects; III Values and traditional knowledge). Auckland University, New Zealand, Waitangi Tribunal report for the Wai 262 claimGoogle Scholar
- Root-Bernstein M, Root-Bernstein R (2003) Martha Graham, Dance, and the Polymathic Imagination. A Case for Multiple Intelligences or Universal Thinking Tools? J Dance Educ 3(1):16–27View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paora R, Tuiono T, Flavell TU, Hawksley C, Howson R (2011) Tino Rangatiratanga and Mana Motuhake. Alter Native 7(3):246–257Google Scholar
- Servos N (1981) The Emancipation of Dance: Pina Bausch and the Wuppertal Dance Theatre. Modern Drama 23(4):435–447View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Severne CM (1995) Traditional use of geothermal resources by New Zealand Māori. Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress, Florence, Italy, pp 401–404Google Scholar
- Silverman (1976) Re-Reading Merleau-Ponty”. Telos 29:106–129View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith GH (1990) Research Issues Related to Māori Education, paper presented to NZARE Special Interest Conference, Massey University, reprinted in 1992, The Issue of Research and Māori, Research Unit for Māori Education. The University of Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- Smith NS, Nelson L (1997) Contact Improvisation 25th Anniversary Sourcebook. Collected writings and graphics from Contact Quarterly dance journal 1975–1992. Contact Editions. ISBN 0-937645-04-4, 260 p.Google Scholar
- Stevenson MG (1996) Indigenous knowledge in environmental assessment. Arctic 49:278–291View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stokoe P, Schächter A (1977) La Expresión Corporal, Paidósth edn. Barcelona, Spain, p 111Google Scholar
- Stokoe P (1978) El movimiento como liberador de potencialidades. In: Gainza V, Hebrón A, Fessler O, Stokoe P. Educación y Expresión Estética, Plus Ultra Edition, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 153p.Google Scholar
- Swanson DA (2008) Hawaiian oral tradition describes 400 years of volcanic activity at Kīlauea. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 176:427–431View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tapuke S, Procter JN, Cronin SJ, Roskruge N (2006) Working effectively with tangata whenua in volcanic risk management in Aotearoa-New Zealand. In: Volume A, Conference F (eds) Abstracts Volume, Fourth Conference, Cities on Volcanoes IAVCEI. Instituto Geofisico de la Escuela Politecnica Nacional, Quito, Ecuador, pp 176–177Google Scholar
- Te Ahukaramū Charles Royal (2012) Whenua-how the land was shaped-The North and South islands. Te Ara, the Encyclopaedia of New Zealand. URL: http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/whenua-how-the-land-was-shaped/page-2
- Tost M, Cronin SJ, Procter JN, Smith IEM, Neall VE, Price RC (2014) Impacts of catastrophic volcanic collapse on the erosion and morphology of a distal fluvial landscape: Hautapu River, Mount Ruapehu, New Zealand. Geol Soc Am Bull B31010:1Google Scholar
- Vervaeck A (2012) The impact of cultural and religious influences during natural disasters (volcano eruptions). Earthquake-Reprot.com. http://earthquake-report.com/2012/09/27/the-impact-of-cultural-and-religious-influences-during-natural-disasters-volcano-eruptions/
- Waitangi Tribunal, 2013. Nga Iwi o te Kahui Maunga. In: Wai 1130 Te Kāhui Maunga: The National Park District Inquiry Report. Chapter 2: http://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/waitangi-tribunal/reports_old/wai-1130-te-kahui-maunga-the-national-park-district-inquiry-report/chapter-2-nga-iwi-o-te-kahui-maunga
- Te Huki M (2013) Ko Matua Te Mana (the song dedicated to Mt. Ruapehu, written with the teachers and children of Te Kura Kaupapa Māori o Ngāti Rangi at Ohākune) http://www.reverbnation.com/matiuthehooktehuki/songs
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.